|
ATCC
epithelial cell growth kit ![]() Epithelial Cell Growth Kit, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/bronchial+epithelial+cells/Bronchial+Epithelial+Cell+Growth+Kit/pm39601620-147-6-11 Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
epithelial cell growth kit - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
95/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Innoprot Inc
bronchial epithelial cell medium ![]() Bronchial Epithelial Cell Medium, supplied by Innoprot Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/bronchial+epithelial+cells/Bronchial+Epithelial+Cell+Medium/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__05__07__723425-212-15-20 Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
bronchial epithelial cell medium - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
94/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
ATCC
bronchial tracheal epithelial cells hbtec ![]() Bronchial Tracheal Epithelial Cells Hbtec, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/bronchial+epithelial+cells/Primary+Bronchial%2FTracheal+Epithelial+Cells%3B+Fibrosis/pmc10923791-273-1-9 Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
bronchial tracheal epithelial cells hbtec - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
99/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
ATCC
bronchial tracheal epithelial cell growth kit ![]() Bronchial Tracheal Epithelial Cell Growth Kit, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/bronchial+epithelial+cells/Bronchial+Epithelial+Cell+Growth+Kit/pmc12689914-100-16-21 Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
bronchial tracheal epithelial cell growth kit - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
96/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
ATCC
primary bronchial tracheal epithelial cells normal ![]() Primary Bronchial Tracheal Epithelial Cells Normal, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/bronchial+epithelial+cells/Primary+Bronchial%2FTracheal+Epithelial+Cells%3B+Normal%2C+Human/pmc09451105-43-0-7 Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
primary bronchial tracheal epithelial cells normal - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
95/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
ATCC
human bronchial epithelial cells ![]() Human Bronchial Epithelial Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/bronchial+epithelial+cells/Primary+Bronchial+Tracheal%3B+Epithelial+Cells%2C+Fibrosis%3B+Human/pmc07307179-411-0-5 Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human bronchial epithelial cells - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
95/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
ATCC
primary human bronchial epithelial cells ![]() Primary Human Bronchial Epithelial Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/bronchial+epithelial+cells/Primary+Bronchial%2FTracheal+Epithelial+Cells%3B+Normal%2C+Human/10__1165_slash_rcmb__2019___0200oc-109-0-5 Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
primary human bronchial epithelial cells - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
99/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
ATCC
human bronchial epithelial cells hbecs ![]() Human Bronchial Epithelial Cells Hbecs, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/bronchial+epithelial+cells/Primary+Bronchial%2FTracheal+Epithelial+Cells%3B+COPD/pmc08204964-55-0-8 Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human bronchial epithelial cells hbecs - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
93/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
ATCC
bronchial epithelial cell line ![]() Bronchial Epithelial Cell Line, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/bronchial+epithelial+cells/HBEC3-KT%3B+Bronchial+Epithelial+Cells%3B+Human/pmc08537250-80-2-11 Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
bronchial epithelial cell line - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
95/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
ATCC
bronchial tracheal epithelial cells ![]() Bronchial Tracheal Epithelial Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/bronchial+epithelial+cells/Primary+Bronchial%2FTracheal+Epithelial+Cells%3B+Asthma/pmc12994253-51-2-9 Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
bronchial tracheal epithelial cells - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
99/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
ATCC
normal primary human lobar bronchial epithelial lbe cells ![]() Normal Primary Human Lobar Bronchial Epithelial Lbe Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/bronchial+epithelial+cells/Primary+Lobar+Bronchial+Epithelial+Cells%3B+Normal%3B+Human/pm36610792-49-9-20 Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
normal primary human lobar bronchial epithelial lbe cells - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
94/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Image Search Results
Journal: Allergy
Article Title: Human Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Cells Respond to House Dust Mite Extract With PAR-1 Dependent Release of CGRP.
doi: 10.1111/all.16416
Figure Lengend Snippet: FIGURE 1 | Characterization of iPNEC and ePNEC cultures. (A) Quantitative RT-PCR showing expression of characteristic PNEC markers in human cultured iPSC and -HBEC-derived iPNEC (□ female, 22; ■ male, 32) and ePNEC (● male, 52; ▲ male, 56; ○ female, 55) and control HBEC at day 60 in ALI culture, respectively. (B) Mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) of CHGA+/Hoechst+ cells (left) and SYP+/Hoechst+ cells [34] at day 60. Data is representative of four different culture plate wells per group for one biological donor for each cell type (ePNEC male, 52; iPNEC male, 32). (C) Representative IF images show SYP+ cells and nuclei are counterstained with Hoechst. 20× magnification and scale bars at 100 μm. (D) Single- cell RNA sequencing identifies two ePNEC clusters in 60-day-old ePNEC differentiated cells. Each dot represents one well and data shown for mean ± SEM. Mann–Whitney test performed for (A, B); * < 0.05. ASCL1, Achaete-Scute Family BHLH Transcription Factor 1; CHGA, Chromogranin A; ePNEC, epithelial-derived pulmonary neuroendocrine cells; iPNEC, iPSC-derived pulmonary neuroendocrine cells; iPSC, induced pluripotent stem cells; SYP, Synaptophysin.
Article Snippet: Cells were grown using the bronchial
Techniques: Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing, Cell Culture, Derivative Assay, Control, RNA Sequencing, MANN-WHITNEY
Journal: Allergy
Article Title: Human Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Cells Respond to House Dust Mite Extract With PAR-1 Dependent Release of CGRP.
doi: 10.1111/all.16416
Figure Lengend Snippet: FIGURE 4 | CGRP release after HDM stimulation is PAR1-dependent (A) Single-cell transcriptomics data of iPNECs (GSE146990, Hor et al.) and ePNEC for PAR1 (F2R), PAR2 (F2RL1), PAR3 (F2RL2), and PAR4 (F2RL3) genes. (B) SYP and PAR1 immunohistochemical co-staining in naive iPNEC (male, 32). 20× and 100× magnification and scale bars at 50 and 10 μm, respectively. (C, D) CALCB mRNA (C) and CGRP protein (D) expression in different ePNEC (● male, 52; ▲ male, 56; ○ female, 55) conditions after 2 h: 50 μL PBS, HDM (1200 μg/mL), PAR1 inhibitor Vorapaxar (80 μM) and PAR1 agonist TFLLR-NH2 (2 μM). (E) CALCB mRNA RT-PCR expression in different ePNEC conditions after 2 h: 50 μL PBS, HDM (1200 μg/mL), HDM co-incubation with protease inhibitors Chymostatin (broad spectrum, 10 μg/mL), PMSF (serine specific, 0.25 mM) and E-64 (cysteine specific, 10 μM). Inhibitor/agonist and or HDM added at the same time. Each dot represents one well and data shown for mean ± SEM. One-way ANOVA for (C, D, E); * < 0.05, ** < 0.01, *** < 0.001, **** < 0.0001. Symbol on top of multiple brackets represents all brackets. Agonist, PAR1 agonist vorapaxar; ePNEC, epithelial-derived pulmonary neuroendocrine cells; Inh., PAR1 inhibitor; iPNEC, iPSC-derived pulmonary neuroendocrine cells; HDM, House dust mite; PAR1, Protease activated receptor 1; SYP, Synaptophysin.
Article Snippet: Cells were grown using the bronchial
Techniques: Single-cell Transcriptomics, Immunohistochemical staining, Staining, Expressing, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction, Incubation, Derivative Assay
Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: Site-Specific Entry Factors Define Cellular Susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 in Human Tissues
doi: 10.64898/2026.05.07.723425
Figure Lengend Snippet: SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus ex vivo infected nasal epithelial cells (n=3 pools). (E-H) SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus ex vivo infected lung epithelial cells (n= 9). (I-L) SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus ex vivo infected renal cortex cells (n=7). Flow cytometry plots showing the phenotypic comparison between GFP⁺ (infected, green) and GFP⁻ (uninfected) cells of CD45 - CD31 - EpCAM + cells from the (A) pool #NAL02 (n= 7) or (E) #HLTE197, which includes a paired sample exposed to a spike-empty pseudovirus (background). (B and F) Violin plots depicting the frequency (%) of different epithelial marker expressions within total nasal ( B ) or pulmonary ( F ) EpCAM + (grey) and EpCAM + GFP + cells (green). (C-D and G-H) Boolean pie charts displaying the proportion of nasal ( C-D ) or pulmonary ( G-H ) EpCAM + ( C-G ) and EpCAM + GFP + ( D-H ) cells expressing combinations of color code molecules according to the legend and indicated as surrounding arcs around the pie chart. (I) Flow cytometry plots showing the phenotypic comparison of CD45 - CD31 - cells from #RINN22, either infected (GFP⁺; green) or exposed to a ‘background’ pseudovirus. (J) Violin plots depicting the frequency (%) of various molecules within total CD31 - (grey) and CD31 - GFP + cells (green). (K-L) Boolean pie charts displaying the proportion of CD31 - ( K ) and CD31 - GFP + ( L ) cells expressing combinations of color code molecules according to the legend and indicated as surrounding arcs around the pie chart. For all violin plots, data are represented as median ± IQR. Statistical analyses were performed using two-sided nonparametric Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test.
Article Snippet: Nasal epithelial cells were obtained with an ASI Rhino-Pro® nasal curette (Arlington, IL, USA) into
Techniques: Ex Vivo, Infection, Flow Cytometry, Comparison, Marker, Expressing
Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: Site-Specific Entry Factors Define Cellular Susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 in Human Tissues
doi: 10.64898/2026.05.07.723425
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) UMAP projection of high-dimension single-cell flow cytometry nasal data of EpCAM + cells from ex vivo SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus infected samples, depicting the differentiation of 8 clusters (MC) and relative abundance of each cluster across the three pools of nasal samples. (B) UMAP visualization highlighting the EpCAM + GFP + infected population (green). Adjacent heatmap displays normalized mean fluorescence intensity of epithelial markers across the 8 identified clusters as indicated in (A) . (C) UMAP-based visualization of the spatial expression of six molecules (top) and density histograms comparing EpCAM⁺ and EpCAM⁺GFP⁺ populations (bottom).
Article Snippet: Nasal epithelial cells were obtained with an ASI Rhino-Pro® nasal curette (Arlington, IL, USA) into
Techniques: Single Cell, Flow Cytometry, Ex Vivo, Infection, Fluorescence, Expressing
Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: Site-Specific Entry Factors Define Cellular Susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 in Human Tissues
doi: 10.64898/2026.05.07.723425
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) UMAP projection of high-dimension single-cell flow cytometry data of pulmonary EpCAM + cells from uninfected or ex vivo SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus infected samples, depicting the differentiation of 8 clusters (MC) and relative abundance of each cluster across uninfected versus infected samples (bars on top). Bars below show the percentage of less represented clusters (MC03-MC08). (B) UMAP visualization highlighting the EpCAM + GFP + infected population (green). Adjacent heatmap (bottom) displays normalized mean fluorescence intensity of epithelial markers across the 8 identified clusters as indicated in (A) highlighting the cluster representing GFP + cells (MC07). (C) Volcano plot displaying the differential cluster abundance comparing uninfected and infected samples, the green dot corresponds to MC07. (D) UMAP-based visualization of the spatial expression of six molecules (top) and density histograms comparing EpCAM⁺ and EpCAM⁺GFP⁺ populations (bottom).
Article Snippet: Nasal epithelial cells were obtained with an ASI Rhino-Pro® nasal curette (Arlington, IL, USA) into
Techniques: Single Cell, Flow Cytometry, Ex Vivo, Infection, Fluorescence, Expressing
Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: Site-Specific Entry Factors Define Cellular Susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 in Human Tissues
doi: 10.64898/2026.05.07.723425
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) UMAP projection of high-dimension single-cell flow cytometry data of renal CD31 - cells from uninfected or ex vivo SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus infected samples, depicting the differentiation of 17 clusters (MC) and relative abundance of each cluster across uninfected versus infected samples. (B) UMAP visualization highlighting the CD31 - GFP + infected population (green). Adjacent heatmap displays normalized mean fluorescence intensity of epithelial markers across the 17 identified clusters as indicated in ( A ) highlighting the cluster representing GFP + cells (MC05). (C) Volcano plot displaying the differential cluster abundance comparing uninfected and infected samples, the green dot corresponds to MC05. (D) UMAP-based visualization of the spatial expression of six molecules (top) and density histograms comparing CD31 - and CD31 - GFP + populations (bottom).
Article Snippet: Nasal epithelial cells were obtained with an ASI Rhino-Pro® nasal curette (Arlington, IL, USA) into
Techniques: Single Cell, Flow Cytometry, Ex Vivo, Infection, Fluorescence, Expressing
Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: Site-Specific Entry Factors Define Cellular Susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 in Human Tissues
doi: 10.64898/2026.05.07.723425
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Schematic overview of the experimental workflow. Epithelial cells were isolated from nasal, lung, and kidney tissues and infected ex vivo with SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus. GFP⁺ (infected) and GFP⁻ (uninfected) cells were sorted and processed using Smart-seq2. After quality control, cells were clustered and analyzed by tissue. (B–D) Nasal epithelial cells. (B) UMAP embedding of five transcriptionally distinct clusters. (C) Cluster distribution across all nasal epithelial cells. (D) Cluster proportions stratified by GFP⁺ and GFP⁻ conditions. (E–G) Lung epithelial cells. (E) UMAP embedding of lung-derived cells showing the separation of three epithelial and one stromal population. (F) Cluster distribution across epithelial and stromal populations. (G) Cluster proportions by infection status. (H–J) Renal cortex epithelial cells. (H) UMAP embedding of two epithelial clusters. (I) Cluster distribution across all renal epithelial cells. (J) Cluster proportions stratified by GFP⁺ and GFP⁻ conditions.
Article Snippet: Nasal epithelial cells were obtained with an ASI Rhino-Pro® nasal curette (Arlington, IL, USA) into
Techniques: Isolation, Infection, Ex Vivo, Control, Derivative Assay
Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: Site-Specific Entry Factors Define Cellular Susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 in Human Tissues
doi: 10.64898/2026.05.07.723425
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Violin plots showing distributions of standard single-cell RNA-seq quality control metrics across all cells, including the number of detected genes (nFeature_RNA), total UMI counts (nCount_RNA), and the percentage of mitochondrial transcripts (percent.mt). ( B ) Heatmap of the top 10 differentially expressed genes for each identified cluster. Genes are ranked by average log-normalized expression within each cluster relative to others. Color scale indicates scaled expression levels. ( C ) Violin plots depicting normalized expression levels of selected epithelial marker genes ( EPCAM, ELF3, CLDN4 , and CDH1 ) across the indicated clusters, highlighting cluster-specific expression patterns. ( D ) Dot plot summarizing the expression of representative marker genes across clusters, based on Ahn, J.H., et al. (2021. J. Clin. Invest). Dot size reflects the percentage of cells expressing each gene, and color intensity represents the average expression level within each cluster
Article Snippet: Nasal epithelial cells were obtained with an ASI Rhino-Pro® nasal curette (Arlington, IL, USA) into
Techniques: Single Cell, RNA Sequencing, Control, Expressing, Marker
Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: Site-Specific Entry Factors Define Cellular Susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 in Human Tissues
doi: 10.64898/2026.05.07.723425
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Violin plots showing distributions of standard single-cell RNA-seq quality control metrics across all cells, including the number of detected genes (nFeature_RNA), total UMI counts (nCount_RNA), and the percentage of mitochondrial transcripts (percent.mt). (B) Heatmap of the top 10 differentially expressed genes per cluster, highlighting transcriptionally distinct epithelial and stromal compartments. Genes are ranked by average log-normalized expression within each cluster relative to others. Color scale indicates scaled expression levels. (C) Violin plots depicting normalized expression levels of representative markers: epithelial markers EPCAM and ELF3 enriched in epithelial groups, and stromal/extracellular matrix markers DCN and MFAP4 enriched in fibroblasts.
Article Snippet: Nasal epithelial cells were obtained with an ASI Rhino-Pro® nasal curette (Arlington, IL, USA) into
Techniques: Single Cell, RNA Sequencing, Control, Expressing
Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: Site-Specific Entry Factors Define Cellular Susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 in Human Tissues
doi: 10.64898/2026.05.07.723425
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Violin plots showing distributions of standard single-cell RNA-seq quality control metrics across all cells, including the number of detected genes (nFeature_RNA), total UMI counts (nCount_RNA), and the percentage of mitochondrial transcripts (percent.mt). (B) Heatmap of the top 10 differentially expressed genes per cluster, separating proximal tubular epithelial cells from broader epithelial populations. Genes are ranked by average log-normalized expression within each cluster relative to others. Color scale indicates scaled expression levels. (C) Violin plots depicting normalized expression levels of representative markers: epithelial marker EPCAM enriched in epithelial cells, proximal-tubule markers AQP1 and CUBN enriched in the proximal tubular epithelial cluster and SLC12A3 , expressed in the distal convoluted tubule.
Article Snippet: Nasal epithelial cells were obtained with an ASI Rhino-Pro® nasal curette (Arlington, IL, USA) into
Techniques: Single Cell, RNA Sequencing, Control, Expressing, Marker
Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: Site-Specific Entry Factors Define Cellular Susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 in Human Tissues
doi: 10.64898/2026.05.07.723425
Figure Lengend Snippet: Volcano plots showing differentially expressed genes between GFP⁺ and GFP⁻ in overall epithelial cells from the (A) nasal mucosa, (B) lung parenchyma and (C) renal cortex; or in individual clusters from a given tissue: (D) epithelial cluster 0 from the nasal mucosa; (F) alveolar type 2 (AT2) cells from the lung; and (G) general epithelial cluster from renal cortex. The horizontal axis shows log₂ fold change, and the vertical axis shows –log₁₀ adjusted p values. Selected significantly upregulated genes (in red) are highlighted in bigger dots.
Article Snippet: Nasal epithelial cells were obtained with an ASI Rhino-Pro® nasal curette (Arlington, IL, USA) into
Techniques:
Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: Site-Specific Entry Factors Define Cellular Susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 in Human Tissues
doi: 10.64898/2026.05.07.723425
Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A–B ) SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus entry in lung ( A ) and kidney ( B ) epithelial cells following treatment with inhibitors. Lung or renal cortex-derived cells were exposed to pseudovirus in the presence of anti-ACE2 (25 µg/ml), Camostat (100 µM), KP-457 (ADAM17 inhibitor, 100 µM), anti-IL1R1 (100 µM), Ruxolitinib (JAK1/2 inhibitor, 100 µM), anti-ADAMTSL3 (250 ng/ml), anti-CADM1 (625 ng/ml), anti-GULP1 (625 ng/ml), anti-MDGA2 (62.5 ng/ml), anti-PILRα (1.25 µg/ml) or anti-PTPRK (1.25 µg/ml). Infection levels, quantified by luciferase activity, are expressed relative to untreated controls (100% infection). Each color-coded dot indicates an individual tissue with median and interquartile range indicated for each treatment with dotted lines. Statistical significance was assessed using a Kruskal–Wallis test for multiple comparisons (****P < 0.0001, ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05). ( C ) Plots showing Spearman correlation coefficients and associated significant P values comparing inhibitor effects across lung and kidney tissues.
Article Snippet: Nasal epithelial cells were obtained with an ASI Rhino-Pro® nasal curette (Arlington, IL, USA) into
Techniques: Derivative Assay, Infection, Luciferase, Activity Assay
Journal: Nature Communications
Article Title: PMI-controlled mannose metabolism and glycosylation determines tissue tolerance and virus fitness
doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-46415-4
Figure Lengend Snippet: a Growth curves of A549-wildtype (WT) and knockout ( PMI -/- ) cells supplemented with 0, 5, or 25 mM of mannose ( n = 4 biological repeats). b Bioenergetic profiles of H1N1-infected WT and PMI -/- cells supplemented with or without mannose (25 mM) treatment. Cells were pre-treated with mannose overnight before virus infection for another 12 h. Glycolytic rate of the cells were analyzed using a Seahorse XF analyzer by measuring the glycoPER kit ( n = 5 biological repeats). c Mitochondrial respiration of the cells was analyzed using a Seahorse XF analyzer by measuring the oxygen consumption rates (OCR, n = 5 biological repeats). d Either PMI overexpression (O/E) or supplement of PMI metabolite Fructose-6-phosphate (F6P) antagonize the suppression of low mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) by mannose. A549 cells were pre-treated with the indicated treatment for overnight before H1N1 infection (MOI = 2). After 12 h, cells were subject to MMP analysis after JC-1 staining ( n = 3 biological repeats). e Dual PMI depletion and mannose treatment is unfavorable whereas supplement of F6P reverses the mitochondrial damage. A549-WT and PMI –/– cells were pre-treated with the indicated treatment, followed by H1N1 infection and MMP measurement after JC-1 staining ( n = 3 biological repeats). f MMP assay by TMRE Staining. hBTEC (left panel) and A549 cells (right panel) were pre-incubated with the indicated treatment for 12 h before H1N1 virus infection (MOI = 0.2). Cells were subject to TMRE (200 nM) staining for 20 min, and DAPI staining for normalization. The fluorescence intensities were detected by a plate reader, whereas the images were captured by GE IN Cell Analyzer 6500HS ( n = 3 biological repeats). g Knockout of PMI impair the modulatory activity of mannose against IL-1β production. The experiments were performed in WT and PMI –/– cells transfected with PMI plasmid and/or Poly(I:C) as indicated ( n = 3 biological repeats). All the results are shown as mean ± SD. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test was used for ( a , d , e ). Unpaired and two-sided student’s T test was used for ( f , g ). **** P < 0.0001, *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05, and n.s. indicates non-significant.
Article Snippet: The
Techniques: Knock-Out, Infection, Virus, Over Expression, Membrane, Staining, Mmp Assay, Incubation, Fluorescence, Activity Assay, Transfection, Plasmid Preparation
Journal: Cell reports
Article Title: Interferon (IFN)-γ promotes monocyte-mediated lung injury during influenza infection
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110456
Figure Lengend Snippet: Key Resources Table
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Virus, Recombinant, cDNA Synthesis, SYBR Green Assay, Protein Extraction, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Lactate Dehydrogenase Assay, Software, Microscopy, Flow Cytometry, Fluorescence
Journal: American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
Article Title: Electronic Nicotine Delivery System Aerosol-induced Cell Death and Dysfunction in Macrophages and Lung Epithelial Cells
doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2019-0200oc
Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 1: ENDS aerosol exposure causes increased cell death in human lung epithelial cells The BEAS-2B cell line was exposed to ENDS aerosol with (PG/VG N+) and without nicotine (PG/VG N-), 100μM Nicotine (Nicotine), HEPA filtered air (Air), and room temperature (Untreated) for 4 min. Cell death was analyzed 24h after treatment by flow cytometry using Caspase-3/7 stain and SYTOXTM permeability dye. Representative plots are shown in (A) and quantification show in (B-E). Necrotic cells are defined as SYTOXTM +, Caspase-3/7- (i) (B). Secondary necrotic cells are dual positive (ii) (C). Apoptotic cells are Caspase-3/7+, SYTOXTM- (iii) (D). All cells with activated Caspase-3/7 (E). Experiments were performed 3 times with an n > 3 per group. *=p<0.05 compared to untreated, #=p<0.05 compared to air, &=p<0.05 compared to PG/VG N-, %=p<0.05 compared to Nicotine. Data were analyzed using ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Mean values are shown with SEM.
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Aerosol, Flow Cytometry, Staining, Permeability
Journal: American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
Article Title: Electronic Nicotine Delivery System Aerosol-induced Cell Death and Dysfunction in Macrophages and Lung Epithelial Cells
doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2019-0200oc
Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 2: ENDS aerosol exposure causes increased cell death in mouse lung epithelial cells The MLE12 cell line was exposed to ENDS aerosol with (PG/VG N+) and without nicotine (PG/VG N-), 100μM Nicotine (Nicotine), HEPA filtered air (Air), and room temperature (Untreated) for 4 min. Cell death was analyzed 24h after treatment by flow cytometry using Caspase-3/7 stain and SYTOXTM permeability dye. Representative plots are shown in (A) and quantification show in (B-E). Necrotic cells are defined as SYTOXTM +, Caspase-3/7- (i) (B). Secondary necrotic cells are dual positive (ii) (C). Apoptotic cells are Caspase-3/7+, SYTOXTM- (iii) (D). All cells with activated Caspase-3/7 (E). Experiments were performed 3 times with an n > 3 per group. *=p<0.05 compared to untreated, #=p<0.05 compared to air, &=p<0.05 compared to PG/VG N-, %=p<0.05 compared to Nicotine. Data were analyzed using ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Mean values are shown with SEM.
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Aerosol, Flow Cytometry, Staining, Permeability
Journal: American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
Article Title: Electronic Nicotine Delivery System Aerosol-induced Cell Death and Dysfunction in Macrophages and Lung Epithelial Cells
doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2019-0200oc
Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 3: One week of ENDS aerosol exposure causes decreased trans-epithelial resistance, dissociation of cells, and cell death Primary human bronchial epithelial cells were differentiated on transwell inserts into a pseudostratified epithelial layer. These cells were exposed to ENDS aerosol with (PG/VG N+) and without nicotine (PG/VG N- ), HEPA filtered air (Air), 100uM nicotine (Nicotine), and room temperature (Untreated) for 4 min. Trans- epithelial resistance was measured using a WPI EVOM TEER meter and STX3 electrode. Measurements were taken in triplicate and averaged. Background readings of empty wells as well as baseline measurements of each sample were used to calculate the change in resistance over the course of the treatment. Dissociated and dead cells were detected using trypan blue exclusion and counting on a hemocytometer. Treatments occurred once per day for 7 days. Experiments were performed 2 times with an n > 3 per group. *=p<0.05 compared to untreated, #=p<0.05 compared to air, %=p<0.05 compared to Nicotine. Data were analyzed using ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Mean values are shown with SEM.
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Aerosol
Journal: Annals of Medicine
Article Title: Hsa_circ_0042823 accelerates cancer progression via miR-877-5p/FOXM1 axis in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma
doi: 10.1080/07853890.2021.1934725
Figure Lengend Snippet: Hsa_circ_0042823 was up-regulated in AMC-HN-8 and TU686 cells. (A) The expression of hsa_circ_0042823 in HBECs, AMC-HN-8 and TU686 cells was assessed through qRT-PCR. (B and C) The qRT-PCR was performed to detect hsa_circ_00428233 expression in the AMC-HN-8 and TU686 cells after hsa_circ_0042823 overexpression or knockdown. ** p < .01 compared with HBECs; ## p < .01 compared with Vector; $$ p < .01 compared with Si-NC.
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Over Expression, Knockdown, Plasmid Preparation
Journal: Pharmaceuticals
Article Title: Corylin Ameliorates LPS-Induced Acute Lung Injury via Suppressing the MAPKs and IL-6/STAT3 Signaling Pathways
doi: 10.3390/ph14101046
Figure Lengend Snippet: Anti-inflammatory effect of corylin on LPS-induced ALI. The experimental results demonstrated that corylin attenuated the overproduction of IL-6 in LPS-activated human bronchial epithelial cells. In intratracheal LPS-induced ALI mice, corylin attenuated tissue damages, suppressed inflammatory cell infiltration, and decreased secretion of IL-6 and TNF-α in the BALF and serum; moreover, it further inhibited the expression of phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), including the expression of p-JNK/JNK, p-ERK/ERK, p-p38/p38, and repressed the activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) in lung. Taken together, our results are the first to demonstrate the anti-inflammatory effects of corylin on LPS-induced ALI and suggest corylin has significant potential as a novel therapeutic agent for ALI.
Article Snippet: A human
Techniques: Expressing, Phospho-proteomics, Activation Assay